Jeffrey David Maund’s bigotry

Jeffrey David Maund is a former pastor of the Baptist Union of Great Britain. Jeffrey David Maund gave me a book which was the who’s who of the old testament. The book given to me by Jeffrey David Maund has detailed accounts of Abraham and his son Isaac.

When I tried to explain to Jeffrey David Maund that I deduced from the book that the practice of circumcision must have come from Abraham not being able to “cope with Isaac’s behaviour” because he was born when Abraham and Sarah were over 90 and baptism was introduced by John and Jesus to replace the need for Jews and Muslims to circumcise, Jeffrey David Maund said I was “A bit mixed up.

Jeffrey David Maund is a religious bigot. He claimed to have belonged to the Baptist Union of Great Britain. He should thus believe in baptism for the remission of sins, not circumcision!

Is Christ overdue a re-coming?

Romans 1 is often used as a means to attack homosexuals. However, I hope to show in this article how it is a prophesy of current events beyond acceptance of same sex relationships. I am not trying to say these are necessarily immoral, just that Romans 1 has been an accurate prophesy. Some of the lawful ones, such as being boastful, are things I do!

Verses 18-20 – God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity

18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

This in my view is a prophesy of the coming of Emmanuel, who will come (in Biblical terms) to judge the quick and the dead. Muslims and Christians see Emmanuel as Jesus Christ, but I argue that both Christ and Mohammed were Messiahs and Sons, but as neither united Arab, Jew and Gentile, neither was Emmanuel as neither became King.

Verse 21 – The Condemnation of Atheism

For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

Atheists know of “God” – they acknowledge the concept. They do not believe he exists, thinking science proves their non-belief, when it can’t provided evidence either way.

Verse 22-23 – Means of exchange not ‘godly’

Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

Could this refer to currency, like the £10 note showing Darwin and the birds he studied, as well as the monarch or ruler of the day (who is not God)?

Verse 24 – Non monogamous relationships

Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.

Could refer to pornography, child sex offences, etc.

Verse 25 – Celebrity Worship Syndrome

They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.

Some treat actors as if they are gods, idolising them, following them to gigs, all in pursuit of an image that doesn’t reflect reality. Populist politicians convince people to follow them, for serving themselves and not “God”.

Verse 26-27A – Legalisation of same sex relationships

26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another.

Regardless of whether homosexuality is right or wrong, same-sex relationships, including marriages are child rearing are legal now.

Verse 27B – Gang Rapes

Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

The gang raping of children, regardless of sex, and human trafficking and forced prostitution could be what is referred to here.

Verse 28 –

Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done.

The number of persons found in possession of indecent images of children is increasing. People are filled with venom for others, and otherwise find it acceptable to go against those ideals set out in the “10 Commandments.”

Verse 29-30 – Not regard for mankind

They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, [evil, greed]^1 and [depravity]^2. They are full of [envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice]^3. They are [gossips, 30 slanderers]^4, [God-haters]^5, [insolent, arrogant and boastful]^6; they [invent ways of doing evil]^7; they [disobey their parents]^8;

Could refer to:

  1. The credit crunch
  2. Sexoffences, sexualisation of childhood
  3. World War III at present where so many countries are at war; 9/11, 7/7, school shootings, and other forms of going postal; MPs expenses; Internet trolling (i.e. flame trolling).
  4. The News of the World, other tabloids, gossip magazines, police corruption (e.g. plebgate).
  5. Atheists.
  6. Social media, including LinkedIn for boasting and arrogance, and Twitter for insolence.
  7. Computer viruses, using social media to abuse others.
  8. Parents often find that if they have more than one child there is a need to but the child whose birthday it isn’t a present too.

 Verse 31 – The consumer society

they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy.

The idea of a life-long marriage of devotion to one person is all but gone. Humans will abuse others without a thought as to their feelings. Humans rarely care about anyone other than Number 1 – them.

Verse 32 – Condoning the above

Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.

Sex offenders get off the hook, bankers and bank directors don’t get punished for their greed, many believe it is acceptable to lie in order to “not” hurt others’ feelings and many think it is find to break the rules to get back at someone who offended them regardless of the consequences. As such it seems acceptable for someone to be denied a benefit to which they are entitled if they happen to offend the person with power to decide whether they can enjoy that benefit to which they are entitled.

God’s Wrath against the Monogamists

Being a confirmed Anglican, I was disgusted to read that Tory MP, Mark Menzies has had to resign after paying for a temporary relationship with a Brazilian male escort.

The Anglican faith dictates that no one person should be bound to another without on-going consent. Monogamy should never prevent a return to sologamy. The Abrahamic Texts make it clear that the monogamists that claim the moral high-ground in terms of their devotion to one person are committing Sin.

The Lord God says that mankind should be fruitful and increase in number [Gen 1, 8, 9, 17, 28, 25, 41]. This creates a clear distinction between having an active sex-life and furthering the gene-pool. The sologamists who ties themselves down to no one are therefore protected by The Lord, being free from fear of adulatory.

Monogamists are going to be condemned to hell under God’s law. The Lord God condemns idolatry [1 Cor 10]. The monogamists who worship their partners as idols also puts them before God, will be condemned [Rom 1, 2]. Their wicked ways of treating their fellow humans as inferior to their idolised partner will leave them condemned in the eyes of The Lord.

Those who condemn Mark Menzies as a sologamist will be condemned themselves [Rom 2]. The Lord protects those who choose the path of sexual freedom. Those monogamists who take wife’s sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while their wife is living is condemned by God [Lev 18:18].

Those monogamists who have sexual relations with their neighbour’s wife and defile themselves with her are condemned by God [Lev 18:20].  And those monogamists who have eyes for someone other than their partner will be condemned [Mat 5]. Such obligations to not apply to sologamists.

All religions are made up, surely?

My mother thinks people won’t respect me because like many post-modernists I have made up my own religion. From my point of view people who adopt pre-existing ways of thought deserve the least respect, especially if unlike me they actually believe their religion to be true!

There are certain things in my life important to me – like my autistic need to eat certain things on certain days. So I have found Biblical stories that I can use to justify these lifestyle choices. If I were using the Bible as many do, to be homophobic, sexist or bigoted in other ways then maybe my mother would have a point. But apparently those people are “traditional” and it is some how fine for them to have a made-up religion that they are using to justify their lifestyle choices, which unlike mine harms others and their rights!

It is argued by a Facebook friend, Donn, that people of all religions believe they are right and others are wrong. This is true, but with the exception mine, which in my view lacks any basis in reality whatsoever! It is completely made up, just like all others!

For me as an expert troll making up one’s own religion is a good way to expose the lack of objectivity in people of a different religion. For instance, Atheists are as deluded as the Christians they try to prove wrong. Atheists are as Abrahamic as Christians, Jews and Muslims. They try to use science to prove the Bible wrong, but in doing so are saying the Bible is a legitimate document!

I am of the view that science has an inherent duty to refute every claim in the Bible. If it is not possible for science to prove a claim either way in the Bible then it should evolve to do so. When the Origin of the Species was first published it was as irrefutable as the Bible. Darwin had no proof we descended from the Great Apes, he just put 2 and 2 together and as it seems from the research published in Nature in the last week, he got 5 instead of 4. This is because scientists have now found human DNA that is 300,000 years old, suggesting a different direction of evolution to the Great Ape theory, of which the oldest Human DNA is 200,000 years old. This means that whilst Darwin’s theory of natural selection is correct, which he discovered after Welsh scientist Russel Wallace discovered it, his Great Ape theory is now thrown into turmoil.

Should we now be asking for Darwin’s theories to be taken out of science lessons and taught in history classes along with the Bible? From my point of view, because of this publication in Nature, both the Bible and The Origin of Species are historical documents that provide an insight into the thinking around the Origin of Man at the time they were written, but have no place in the teaching of science, which had found the histories in these books to be unsupported by evidence.

Proving God exists?

David A Spitz once said:

One might be asked “how can you prove that a god does not exist? One can only reply that it is scarcely necessary to disprove what has never been proved.

David A Spitz clearly hasn’t heard of hypothetico deductive reasoning model!

H0 – There is no evidence to support the existence of a deity
H1 – There is enough evidence to support the existence of a deity so that it is possible to reject the null
H2 – There is not enough evidence to support the case there is no deity, thus the null should not be rejected

On that basis, the ‘null hypothesis’ that it is not possible to know either way is proven.

As yourself this: What is the colour of the sky? The answer is that it is not blue, black, etc. The sky is the same colour all say round but we perceive it differently depending on how our eyes process it.
If you take a look at the image above, that is what bacteria looks like under the microscope. It doesn’t really look like that – the microscope is colouring it to help us understand the bacteria’s elements. It was once not possible to prove such bacteria existed, such as in animals deemed “unclean” by some religions, but science has evolved to develop instruments like the microscope. Maybe science needs a better tool for putting ‘God’ under a microscope, which it can’t do at present?

Apocalypse – Imagining the End Submission

For centuries there has been mystique around the Four Horse Men of the Apocalypse and Revelations in general. This paper shows through regression analysis that Conquest could represent when Solomon became King, War represents the splitting of the Tribes of Israel after Solomon’s line was challenged. Equally, Famine represents the holocaust-like conditions imposed on the Arabs in the Holy Land by the assumed Israel State today, and Death, which is predicted to occur around the year 3,000, represents the return of Christ.

The paper also discusses the role of the Bible as an insight into apocalyptic pasts in the world history.  It is argued that the creation of life on earth is cyclical, and this can be explained by science, and associated with Biblical myths which could be re-tellings of folk tales based on this scientific reality, passed down generations as memes.

The creation and increase in population of mankind in Genesis 1 and 9 can be considered to represent the interbreeding of homo-genus species. The condemnation of mankind for its wrong doings in Genesis 6:1-6 and Romans 1, which can be seen to be reflected in the holocaust of many of God’s children in the Holy Land in the case of the latter. The following drowning of the species in Genesis 6:8 to 8:22 and Revelations 6 can be seen to represent the peak of climate change, where torrential weather conditions drive most species to their death for over indulging in the user of carbon resources.

It can therefore be seen that the creation of mankind is a repeating process, which comes after the flooding of the world (by God or climate change), and is followed by the creation of man (by evolution, or God as Genesis 3), or other advanced beings. If the regression analysis presented is accurate, then theologically Revelations will happen around the year 3,000 where climate change would wipe out all those beings whom cannot live under water as the mammals that evolved from being on the sea to the land after an earlier climate change – or even on top of the water, as with Noah in Genesis 6-9.

Calculating Judgement Day using Multiple Linear Regression: Considering the Four Horsemen of the Apocoplypse

There is a brilliant song by Busted called “Year 3000.” One of the lyrics in it are that in the year 3000 not much has changed but we live under water. Here is a video of them performing it live:

I think there may be a hidden truth in this. If climate change were to bite, one of the safest places for us to retreat to would be the depths of the sea. There is oxygen in water, so it shouldn’t be to difficult to transform it into breathable air within the domes we could live in. But what is so significant about the year 3,000? It is possible that with all the carbon emissions we’re producing, especially due to the growth of economies like China, and other emerging economies in Asia, that the effects of climate change could be speeded up so that an apocalypse-like situation emerges around about this time.

The species that survived the extinction of dinosaurs were the mammals who took to the sea before re-taking the land. Will humans have to live under water to survive climate change?
The species that survived the extinction of dinosaurs were the mammals who took to the sea before re-taking the land. Will humans have to live under water to survive climate change?

I shall present below statistical evidence to support the idea of the ‘four horsemen of the apocalypse’ spoken  of in Revelations, which is in both the Second Testament (the New Testament) and the Third Testament (the Qu’ran).

As you can see above, I have linked world events, as recorded, to the four horsemen of the apocalypse spoken of in Revelations. The dates may not be complete accurate, but there is probably only small variations to the known dates of when King Solomon was enthroned as the Desire of Nations as ruler over the Holy Land and when the tribes of Israel split because the Israelites wouldn’t accept Solomon’s son as King. The latter is what caused the problems in the Middle East we are still seeing today. In terms of famine I have put last year (2012) as the date, which was when Ministers from the Israel State declared a holocaust on the Arabs in the Palestinian Territories within the Holy Land.


Horseman #

1. Conquest

2. War

3. Famine

4. Death

World Event

King Solomon Enthroned

Splitting of Tribes of Israel

Starving of Palestinians

Climate Change Bites






Using these three years, I then use a statistical technique called multiple linear regression to predict the fourth year, which by using the dates I found, means that the ‘Death’ horseman corresponds with the year 3027, which I link to climate change.

Regression is a standard statistical technique, which is based on theory. On that basis it is as valid as any other mathematically calculated theory, including ones claiming to prove a deity does not exist. This theory is based on historical evidence, just as many of the so-called ‘proven’ theories a deity doesn’t exist. The fact is; no theory, no matter what science one users, whether statistics as I have, or simple mental logic based on probability as some others use, until there is strong empirical evidence to support the existence or otherwise of a deity, one person’s judgement is as good as any other.

Based on the above theory, which using a statistical technique, then in religious terms it is likely that Judgement Day, when the return of Jesus occurs, will be around the year 3000. In theological terms I regard the Messiah at the right hand of the Lord will need to be incarnated into someone of David’s line, in order to become the Fourth Messiah and Son (after Solomon, Christ, Muhammed), the third King (after David, Solomon), and second Desire of Nations (after Solomon). I call this person, Isa, which is the Muslim name for Jesus.

Considering Climate Change, Pyramids and Stone Henge

Many people wonder in amazement how the pyramids were built, and other unexplained architectures such as Stone Henge. My answer is simple – There were ancient peoples who were smarter than us. As horrible as that might seem to us, often thinking we are unique, it is what I believe to be true.

In my view climate change is real and has probably happened every 65 million years or so since the planet first formed. It wiped out the dinosaurs – except the ones who could swim or survive the torrential weather conditions.

On that basis I think that any of the ancient wonders that we, indeed, wonder about their creation were not created by primitive people from our evolutionary cycle, but by earlier ones smarter than us. What if they were trolls, like the Mayans’  could have been, leaving weather proof architecture?

On that basis I think there are two possible truths for Stone Henge:

  • The were moved by the extreme weather during a previous climate change episode from Pembrokeshire to Salisbury Plane, where they were then erected by other peoples.
  • People with technology as advanced as ours moved them from Pembrokeshire to where they are now and erected them something close to what we have now.

In both cases the reason the stones look as ragged as the do was because of the rough weather conditions from climate change. The next time I come across something from ancient times where humans wonder how it could have happened, my first premise will be that ancient people, likely to be smarter than us, did in it ways more likely to be advanced than early humans would have been capable of doing.

So when climate change wipes us out, maybe some of the following will happen (tongue in cheek):

  • The Statue of Liberty could float to France
  • The Millennium Dome and Eiffel Tower could finally be destroyed as planned
  • People will be wondering what people were worshipping in the US Pentagon
  • People will wonder if the Angel of the North was who we thought ‘God’ was

I’m certain climate change will wipe us out and in millions of years time there will be people who have evolved like us writing and speaking us in the same way we do ancient species.

The Holy Trinity and the Desire of Nations

In the Holy Trinity of Christianity there is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. These are God, Christ and the Holy Ghost.

Many Christians believe all three are equal. But I would say that to believe this would be to break the ten commandments as there should be no god (including Christ) above The Lord (i.e. God/Allah).

Equally, I don’t think that Jesus Christ is the only Son. There is at least two others in my point of view – Solomon and Muhammad. In the three Abrahamic texts (i.e. Bible and Qu’ran) references to “your Lord” and “my Lord” refer to one of The Lord’s Sons.cThe Son could be many people eligible from David’s line. So when “The Lord says unto my Lord” – my Lord is the Son and The Lord is God/Allah.

I has been argued that the problems in Israel and Palestine were caused when the Israelites would not accept Solomon’s son as King. This may be considered correct because Solomon’s line was condemned for him worshipping other gods, the First Testament says. But the situation that exists in that region now – where the leaders are not of David’s line – does not in any way represent the ideal in the Abrahamic texts.

Theologically I think that Christ will come through the body of someone from David’s line – but one which is not from Solomon’s line. Because of the various parts of human nature, The Lord will have to keep the Holy Spirit turning a Son into a Messiah and Son until the point the whole world recognises them as the Desire of Nations by being Messiah, Son and King. So far, Christ and Muhammed have failed. It would not have been necessary for them to have called by The Lord (God/Allah) if Solomon had not worshipped other gods and brought The Lord’s Kingdom on Earth into disrepute. Solomon was once the Desire of Nations, but failed at the job!

An interpretation of Abrahamic texts in relation to the State of Israel, created by Man and not The Lord

This is an interpretation of the Bible in relation to the legitimacy of the State of Israel created by humans in ‘The Lord God’s’ eyes as described in the Abrahamic texts.

The Holy Land and the State of Israel

The Holy Land is not promised to the State of Israel, but to the House of Israel and its King’s subjects. The First Testament says that David’s line shall always be king [2 Samuel 7:12-16, 2 Chronicles 13:5, Psalm 89:20-37]. At the moment Israel does not exist in God’s eyes because it is not led by someone of David’s line. That is the reason Christ has to come again in a form chosen by The Lord God, so The Lord’s ‘Messiah and Son’ can have their rightful place as King of Israel and thus by doing both these things become the ‘Desire of Nations.’

The Rejection of Christ by the Jews

Christ failed to become the Desire of Nations in the Second Testament because even though he was of David’s line and a Messiah and Son, so entitled to be, because he was crucified and not anointed then he failed to become the Desire of Nations of the Holy Land. So in essence, the people in the Holy Land will need to subject themselves to the House of Israel under Christ when he returns to become the Desire of Nations or the Israelites will forever be condemned to be the enemies Christ’s below his feet as they were when he was put on the Cross after they called for his death against The Lord God’s wishes [Matthew 22:44]

The worshipping of Christ and man’s creations

Christ never asked people to worship him. If he had, his line would have been condemned like Solomon’s was. People who worship Christ above The Lord God will be condemned also. The Messiah and Son appointed by The Lord God is the rightful king of Israel – God’s Kingdom on earth.

The Lord God does not recognise of worldly creations – including the recognition of Israel as a earthly State. Whilst the Jews subject themselves to a person who is not not of David’s line then they will forever be the enemies below the feet of Christ, as they were when he was on the cross and they shall never inherit The Lord God’s Kingdom on earth.

The people who worship false idols rather than The Lord God, such as Christians, especially those who idolise Christ will be condemned. Those people, who also condemn the Palestinians whilst worshipping Christ instead of The Lord God, and idolising the State of Israel rather than The Lord God, will be condemned more severely.

The Evilness of the Jews

All those Jews filled with “every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity” who are “full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice,” such as for the Palestinians, yet they know God’s righteous decree that do to these things is wrong will be condemned to death [Romans 1:29].

It is impossible for Jews to make claim to the Holy Land while they are waging war. For the rightful King of Israel to be installed not a bone must be broken. On this basis, The Lord God will not recognise the State of Israel as the rightful heir to his Kingdom on earth, whilst it keeps breaking the bones of all his children.

Those Jews who rob Palestinian temples and those Christians who idolise Christ will be condemned [Romans 2:22]. Such persons will suffer the wrath of The Lord God [Romans 2:5] and each act of violence will be judged by The Lord God based on the harm it caused [Romans 2:6]. By these men doing shameful acts of violence against other men in God’s Kingdom, The Lord God will serve due penalty on them for their error [Romans 1:27]. Equally, those who worship the Israel State, a creation of Man, rather than God, the creator of Man, will be condemned [Romans 1:25].

Those who are Evil who don’t glorify the Lord God

Those Jews who know The Lord God, yet do not Glorify him but their earthly creation of the State of Israel will be sent into sexual impurity so that their direct line from Abraham will be condemned [Romans 1:24]. These Jews will be condemned by The Lord God before the Gentiles [Romans 2:9]. For defending the State of Israel rather than The Lord God, and for worshipping Christ above The Lord God, he shall condemn them to a shameful lust among themselves and the animals, including women, condemning their line [Romans 1:23;1:26]. Those Jews who call for the law to protect them from repression, yet become the repressors themselves shall be condemned [Romans 2:1-4;17-22]. All humans who do evil will be condemned, but the first shall be the Jews [Romans 2:9]. But those Jews who do good, showing peace and tolerance among all shall be rewarded first, but in equal terms to others who do the same [Romans 2:10-11].