Is Ben Evans a fascist?

I once had a Facebook friend called Ben Evans, who originated from Llanelli. Ben Evans deleted me as a friend because he said he didn’t want to associate with people who agree with renewing Trident. I told him to delete me because I didn’t want to be associated with people who prefer censorship and free speech to a pluralism of belief.

It is those who I see as morally corrupt hypocrites, like Ben Evans, who disgust me. Ben Evans takes an emotional point of view against the renewal of Trident and does not want to hear the views of anyone who disagrees with him. Ben Evans is in my view therefore a fascist.

My view on why we should renew Trident is quite a simple one – any form of unilateral disarmament will have the effect of putting the country a risk. Without multilateral disarmament then the only option is to stick fully to the terms agreed in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). That is that we should replace our nuclear warheads until the point that multilateral disarmament is possible.

How ever nice and fluffy Ben Evans wants the world to be, without the human race making itself extinct then we have to accept that we are humans and it is part of our nature to want to harm one another. The only thing that can stop us from harming others is for there to be a disincentive for us to do so. As imperfect as it is, the policy of the UK Government since the 1980s to maintain our nuclear deterrent, based on Mutually Assured Destruction, is the only way to tell other nuclear powers “If you attack us, we will attack you back.

If you think that Ben Evans subjected me to an Internet Death Penalty just for supporting the renewal then maybe it is something about his personality that means he is against it. Could Ben Evans trust himself not to hit fire if he had is finger on the nuclear weapon button? If Ben Evans is not willing to accept one of his Facebook friends as having a different point of view, how could be be trusted to not attack other nations who have a different point of view to him?

I often say that if I was a government minister in Iran that I would want nuclear weapons in order to deter the USA and the State that calls itself Israel from invading. Any government in the world which is at risk from a foreign power would be insane not to want a nuclear deterrent. It would be mad not to have MAD!

In terms of the Iranian situation my view is that there needs to be an Asian Atomic Union. Perhaps starting with Russia, Pakistan and Iran these countries could pool their existing nuclear warheads so not to breach the NPT, but to protect the region from threats of invasion by foreign powers, such as the US, UK and the State that calls itself Israel.

In my view it is only in my view possible to get nuclear disarmament by creating an oligopolistic union of nuclear powers. If there were five nuclear powers, such as NATO, Asia, South America, Africa, and Australasia, which pooled all their nuclear warheads then it would be possible for total disarmament to happen. In the same way having nuclear weapons is based on economics, so the strategy for getting rid of them needs to be.


Apocalypse – Imagining the End Submission

For centuries there has been mystique around the Four Horse Men of the Apocalypse and Revelations in general. This paper shows through regression analysis that Conquest could represent when Solomon became King, War represents the splitting of the Tribes of Israel after Solomon’s line was challenged. Equally, Famine represents the holocaust-like conditions imposed on the Arabs in the Holy Land by the assumed Israel State today, and Death, which is predicted to occur around the year 3,000, represents the return of Christ.

The paper also discusses the role of the Bible as an insight into apocalyptic pasts in the world history.  It is argued that the creation of life on earth is cyclical, and this can be explained by science, and associated with Biblical myths which could be re-tellings of folk tales based on this scientific reality, passed down generations as memes.

The creation and increase in population of mankind in Genesis 1 and 9 can be considered to represent the interbreeding of homo-genus species. The condemnation of mankind for its wrong doings in Genesis 6:1-6 and Romans 1, which can be seen to be reflected in the holocaust of many of God’s children in the Holy Land in the case of the latter. The following drowning of the species in Genesis 6:8 to 8:22 and Revelations 6 can be seen to represent the peak of climate change, where torrential weather conditions drive most species to their death for over indulging in the user of carbon resources.

It can therefore be seen that the creation of mankind is a repeating process, which comes after the flooding of the world (by God or climate change), and is followed by the creation of man (by evolution, or God as Genesis 3), or other advanced beings. If the regression analysis presented is accurate, then theologically Revelations will happen around the year 3,000 where climate change would wipe out all those beings whom cannot live under water as the mammals that evolved from being on the sea to the land after an earlier climate change – or even on top of the water, as with Noah in Genesis 6-9.

Calculating Judgement Day using Multiple Linear Regression: Considering the Four Horsemen of the Apocoplypse

There is a brilliant song by Busted called “Year 3000.” One of the lyrics in it are that in the year 3000 not much has changed but we live under water. Here is a video of them performing it live:

I think there may be a hidden truth in this. If climate change were to bite, one of the safest places for us to retreat to would be the depths of the sea. There is oxygen in water, so it shouldn’t be to difficult to transform it into breathable air within the domes we could live in. But what is so significant about the year 3,000? It is possible that with all the carbon emissions we’re producing, especially due to the growth of economies like China, and other emerging economies in Asia, that the effects of climate change could be speeded up so that an apocalypse-like situation emerges around about this time.

The species that survived the extinction of dinosaurs were the mammals who took to the sea before re-taking the land. Will humans have to live under water to survive climate change?
The species that survived the extinction of dinosaurs were the mammals who took to the sea before re-taking the land. Will humans have to live under water to survive climate change?

I shall present below statistical evidence to support the idea of the ‘four horsemen of the apocalypse’ spoken  of in Revelations, which is in both the Second Testament (the New Testament) and the Third Testament (the Qu’ran).

As you can see above, I have linked world events, as recorded, to the four horsemen of the apocalypse spoken of in Revelations. The dates may not be complete accurate, but there is probably only small variations to the known dates of when King Solomon was enthroned as the Desire of Nations as ruler over the Holy Land and when the tribes of Israel split because the Israelites wouldn’t accept Solomon’s son as King. The latter is what caused the problems in the Middle East we are still seeing today. In terms of famine I have put last year (2012) as the date, which was when Ministers from the Israel State declared a holocaust on the Arabs in the Palestinian Territories within the Holy Land.


Horseman #

1. Conquest

2. War

3. Famine

4. Death

World Event

King Solomon Enthroned

Splitting of Tribes of Israel

Starving of Palestinians

Climate Change Bites






Using these three years, I then use a statistical technique called multiple linear regression to predict the fourth year, which by using the dates I found, means that the ‘Death’ horseman corresponds with the year 3027, which I link to climate change.

Regression is a standard statistical technique, which is based on theory. On that basis it is as valid as any other mathematically calculated theory, including ones claiming to prove a deity does not exist. This theory is based on historical evidence, just as many of the so-called ‘proven’ theories a deity doesn’t exist. The fact is; no theory, no matter what science one users, whether statistics as I have, or simple mental logic based on probability as some others use, until there is strong empirical evidence to support the existence or otherwise of a deity, one person’s judgement is as good as any other.

Based on the above theory, which using a statistical technique, then in religious terms it is likely that Judgement Day, when the return of Jesus occurs, will be around the year 3000. In theological terms I regard the Messiah at the right hand of the Lord will need to be incarnated into someone of David’s line, in order to become the Fourth Messiah and Son (after Solomon, Christ, Muhammed), the third King (after David, Solomon), and second Desire of Nations (after Solomon). I call this person, Isa, which is the Muslim name for Jesus.

The Holy Trinity and the Desire of Nations

In the Holy Trinity of Christianity there is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. These are God, Christ and the Holy Ghost.

Many Christians believe all three are equal. But I would say that to believe this would be to break the ten commandments as there should be no god (including Christ) above The Lord (i.e. God/Allah).

Equally, I don’t think that Jesus Christ is the only Son. There is at least two others in my point of view – Solomon and Muhammad. In the three Abrahamic texts (i.e. Bible and Qu’ran) references to “your Lord” and “my Lord” refer to one of The Lord’s Sons.cThe Son could be many people eligible from David’s line. So when “The Lord says unto my Lord” – my Lord is the Son and The Lord is God/Allah.

I has been argued that the problems in Israel and Palestine were caused when the Israelites would not accept Solomon’s son as King. This may be considered correct because Solomon’s line was condemned for him worshipping other gods, the First Testament says. But the situation that exists in that region now – where the leaders are not of David’s line – does not in any way represent the ideal in the Abrahamic texts.

Theologically I think that Christ will come through the body of someone from David’s line – but one which is not from Solomon’s line. Because of the various parts of human nature, The Lord will have to keep the Holy Spirit turning a Son into a Messiah and Son until the point the whole world recognises them as the Desire of Nations by being Messiah, Son and King. So far, Christ and Muhammed have failed. It would not have been necessary for them to have called by The Lord (God/Allah) if Solomon had not worshipped other gods and brought The Lord’s Kingdom on Earth into disrepute. Solomon was once the Desire of Nations, but failed at the job!

An interpretation of Abrahamic texts in relation to the State of Israel, created by Man and not The Lord

This is an interpretation of the Bible in relation to the legitimacy of the State of Israel created by humans in ‘The Lord God’s’ eyes as described in the Abrahamic texts.

The Holy Land and the State of Israel

The Holy Land is not promised to the State of Israel, but to the House of Israel and its King’s subjects. The First Testament says that David’s line shall always be king [2 Samuel 7:12-16, 2 Chronicles 13:5, Psalm 89:20-37]. At the moment Israel does not exist in God’s eyes because it is not led by someone of David’s line. That is the reason Christ has to come again in a form chosen by The Lord God, so The Lord’s ‘Messiah and Son’ can have their rightful place as King of Israel and thus by doing both these things become the ‘Desire of Nations.’

The Rejection of Christ by the Jews

Christ failed to become the Desire of Nations in the Second Testament because even though he was of David’s line and a Messiah and Son, so entitled to be, because he was crucified and not anointed then he failed to become the Desire of Nations of the Holy Land. So in essence, the people in the Holy Land will need to subject themselves to the House of Israel under Christ when he returns to become the Desire of Nations or the Israelites will forever be condemned to be the enemies Christ’s below his feet as they were when he was put on the Cross after they called for his death against The Lord God’s wishes [Matthew 22:44]

The worshipping of Christ and man’s creations

Christ never asked people to worship him. If he had, his line would have been condemned like Solomon’s was. People who worship Christ above The Lord God will be condemned also. The Messiah and Son appointed by The Lord God is the rightful king of Israel – God’s Kingdom on earth.

The Lord God does not recognise of worldly creations – including the recognition of Israel as a earthly State. Whilst the Jews subject themselves to a person who is not not of David’s line then they will forever be the enemies below the feet of Christ, as they were when he was on the cross and they shall never inherit The Lord God’s Kingdom on earth.

The people who worship false idols rather than The Lord God, such as Christians, especially those who idolise Christ will be condemned. Those people, who also condemn the Palestinians whilst worshipping Christ instead of The Lord God, and idolising the State of Israel rather than The Lord God, will be condemned more severely.

The Evilness of the Jews

All those Jews filled with “every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity” who are “full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice,” such as for the Palestinians, yet they know God’s righteous decree that do to these things is wrong will be condemned to death [Romans 1:29].

It is impossible for Jews to make claim to the Holy Land while they are waging war. For the rightful King of Israel to be installed not a bone must be broken. On this basis, The Lord God will not recognise the State of Israel as the rightful heir to his Kingdom on earth, whilst it keeps breaking the bones of all his children.

Those Jews who rob Palestinian temples and those Christians who idolise Christ will be condemned [Romans 2:22]. Such persons will suffer the wrath of The Lord God [Romans 2:5] and each act of violence will be judged by The Lord God based on the harm it caused [Romans 2:6]. By these men doing shameful acts of violence against other men in God’s Kingdom, The Lord God will serve due penalty on them for their error [Romans 1:27]. Equally, those who worship the Israel State, a creation of Man, rather than God, the creator of Man, will be condemned [Romans 1:25].

Those who are Evil who don’t glorify the Lord God

Those Jews who know The Lord God, yet do not Glorify him but their earthly creation of the State of Israel will be sent into sexual impurity so that their direct line from Abraham will be condemned [Romans 1:24]. These Jews will be condemned by The Lord God before the Gentiles [Romans 2:9]. For defending the State of Israel rather than The Lord God, and for worshipping Christ above The Lord God, he shall condemn them to a shameful lust among themselves and the animals, including women, condemning their line [Romans 1:23;1:26]. Those Jews who call for the law to protect them from repression, yet become the repressors themselves shall be condemned [Romans 2:1-4;17-22]. All humans who do evil will be condemned, but the first shall be the Jews [Romans 2:9]. But those Jews who do good, showing peace and tolerance among all shall be rewarded first, but in equal terms to others who do the same [Romans 2:10-11].

King Solomon – King (of Kings?)

The First Testament states that those who descend from King David shall always be King of Israel (2 Samuel 7:12-16, 2 Chronicles 13:5, Psalm 89:20-37). These people descended from David’s line:

  • King Solomon (First Testament)
  • Jesus Christ (Second Testament)
  • Muhammed (Third Testament)

On this basis all of these people could be Kings of Israel, in a theological context. Lets take a look at some parts of the Bible about the line of King David. King David is quoted as saying in Psalm 110:1 and Matthew 22:44;

The Lord said to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet.”

I interpet ‘my Lord’ in this context to refer to the “son of David,” which in this case is King Solomon, the first son of David, chosen to be King by David himself (1 Kings 1:43-48). From King Solomon descended Christ and Muhammed who also have the right to the title ‘Lord’ on this basis as not only are they equal to God who is The Lord but they are of not only David’s line but King Solomon’s also.

1 Kings 2:44-45 says:

The king also said to Shimei, “You know in your heart all the wrong you did to my father David. Now the Lord will repay you for your wrongdoing. But King Solomon will be blessed, and David’s throne will remain secure before the Lord forever.”

This is why in a theological context I think King David referred to King Solomon as ‘my Lord’ as Solomon was his son and as King of Kings, Solomon was greater than King David himself.

1 Kings 1:49-51 says:

At this, all Adonijah’s guests rose in alarm and dispersed. But Adonijah, in fear of Solomon, went and took hold of the horns of the altar. Then Solomon was told, “Adonijah is afraid of King Solomon and is clinging to the horns of the altar. He says, ‘Let King Solomon swear to me today that he will not put his servant to death with the sword.’”

1 Kings 2 23:25 says:

Then King Solomon swore by the Lord: “May God deal with me, be it ever so severely, if Adonijah does not pay with his life for this request! 24 And now, as surely as the Lord lives—he who has established me securely on the throne of my father David and has founded a dynasty for me as he promised —Adonijah shall be put to death today!” So King Solomon gave orders to Benaiah son of Jehoiada, and he struck down Adonijah and he died.

I interpret these to mean that God (i.e. the Lord) put King Solomon to his right hand until the day David died when Adonijah was the enemy under Solomon’s feet, who was then put to death. This thus makes Solomon the Messiah of the First Testament, in a theological sense. The test for a Messiah is thus that they sit at the right hand of God (i.e. the Lord) until he puts enemies at their feet, which is when they are confirmed as Messiah:

  • In this case of King Solomon this was Adonijah, who refused to accept Solomon as King, whose death with the authority of God confirmed Solomon as Messiah and a Son (i.e. Mashiach ben David I).
  • In this case of Jesus Christ this was the disenting Jews below his Cross, whom called for his death, confirming him as Messiah and Son (i.e. Mashiach ben David II)
  • In the case of Muhammed this was the Hindus Idols worshippers, who made his feet bleed, plunging him into a depression, which led to his confirmation by God that he was Messiah and Son (Mashiach ben David III)

Unlike Christ and Muhammed, Solomon was also King. This makes him therefore the Desire of Nations. Equally, the person prophesied in Revelations will be of David’s line, and will be at the right-hand of the Lord until the day their enemies are below their feet when they will be confirmed by God (i.e. the Lord) as Messiah and Son (i.e. Mashiach ben David IV). If they manage to become King, they will also become Desire of Nations, a title lost by King Solomon, when he ceased to be King. Again, in a theological sense.

Israel’s Got Talent

I recently presented a solution to the constitutional issues that cause the Israel and Palestine conflict. I think there are a number of facts difficult to dispute:

  • Jews are still waiting for the Messiah prophesied in the First Testament;
  • Christians usually think that Jesus Christ was the Messiah;
  • Muslims usually think Christ was a Messiah and often that Mohammed was.

I currently think in a theological context that the Abrahamic texts like the Bible and Qu’ran has ‘Messiahs and Sons’ (i.e. Mashiach ben Davidwho have come in three chosen forms by The Lord (i.e. God):

  • In the First Testament, The Lord chose King Solomon as the first Messiah and Son from David’s line (i.e. Mashiach ben David I);
  • In the Second Testament, The Lord chose Jesus Christ as the second Messiah and Son from David’s line (i.e. Mashiach ben David II);
  • In the Third Testament, The Lord chose Mohammed as the third Messiah and Son from David’s line (i.e. Mashiach ben David III);
  • In a Fourth Testament, The Lord will chose a fourth Messiah and Son from David’s line (i.e. Mashiach ben David IV).

This above is my theological interpretation of the Abrahamic texts, which it is unlikely those stuck to the old ways of interpreting them will agree.  The titled of this blog, ‘Israel’s Got Talent’ is a reference to the idea of Reality TV choosing nominations for Eurovision, etc. so it might be that the selection of the first leader of a shared Israel/Palestine state as I describe could be televised. This elected King of Israel may become a Messiah and Son (i.e. Mashiach ben David) and as forecast in Revelations, Desire of Nations. Whether they are the first as Jews might think, the second as Christians or Muslims might think, or the fourth as I think theologically, there is no denying the fact that the Bible says who ever is King of Israel should be of David’s line.

Zionist Imitation Syndrome – The Disease of the UK Establishment

The Zionists who rule the Israeli Government, in many cases against the wishes of the law abiding Jewish inhabitants of the region, are terrorising the Palestinians. One might think of this terror purely in terms of physical violence, but that is not the worst form of terror.

It is a tradition of Zionists to get satisfaction out of suppressing people – Stopping them enjoying their rights in such a way they feel ultimate despair because they know they are being treated unlawfully, but there is nothing they can do about it. Does this sound familiar? Some of you might be thinking of what the Nazis did to law abiding Jews in the concentration camps, but I’m thinking much closer to home.

The UK Government breaks EU social security and other Council of Europe and European Union Laws every day. Here are the ones they break in my life, which sometimes make me feel a despair like the Palestinians are feeling. Some may think this unlikely, but people who are as principled as me find it that much more overwhelming – we don’t break the law, we know others do, but one should not expect the government to – but they do.

The government are preventing me submitting documentation to them with electronic signatures of any kind. You might not think this a big deal, but when you consider nearly everything I do is online, and I have a disability which makes handling paperwork difficult, so much so that I have to scan in each letter I receive to read it properly, then it is at least inconvenient. But when like me you know the government are breaking the law by not letting me sign documents electronically, and you have the principles I do, then you feel the same despair when our government is breaking the law (Section 7 of the The Electronic Communications Act 2000), as the Palestinians do with the Zionists running Israel breaking the law.

The whole thing got on top of me yesterday when I received back from the government, a claim form that I sent over a month ago, which was for money I needed to pay my staff. The reason they sent it back to me was because they had moved office, even though I sent it to the one on the form and they had received it at that office. The anger that then enraged inside of me that it was sent back to me, had been building up for weeks, as each day of running my business, I have had more and more bureaucracy from the government, which is created mainly by civil servants lack of initiative than my error. Anyone who has worked for me who lacks initiative knows they’d be out on their ears, and many have been. Some of these now work for the government, so I guess I should take some of the blame for an inept public sector.

Why on earth did they not send my form onto to the new office when they would have received it a month ago? Why on earth did it take a month for them to decide to send it to me? I cannot do anything about it. The times I got a solicitor to send them a 7-day notice because they refused to pay it, I didn’t even get a reply, and then I eventually had to cave in because of low cashflow.

It fills me with such rage that the government are breaking the law every day and getting away with it, yet when a benefit claimant breaks welfare law, like the government are breaking the law in relation to my claims, those people are brought to book and face the full force of the law. It is not fair. We have no legal aid to take them on, like I was able to when I was 14. Living in the UK, and I am not being flippant when I say this, is like living in a concentration camp, one with more humans rights abuses per capital than the victims of Israelite suppression in Palestine.